Akadēmiskais centrshttps://doi.org/10.22364/iscflul.9.1.08 | 98-106 | PDF
Oskars Kulmanis, Ph. D.
Latvijas Universitātes Juridiskā fakultāte
Notiesājoša sprieduma taisīšanas iespējamība rakstveida procesā
Possibility of Rendering of a Judgment of Conviction in Written Procedure
Atslēgvārdi: lietas iztiesāšanas veida izvēle kriminālprocesā, rakstveida process, notiesājošs spriedums
Key words: choice of type of trial of the criminal case, written procedure, conviction
Summary
The possibility and necessity of using the written procedure to adjudicate a criminal case in court of appeal became self-evident in COVID-19 emergency. The new legal and factual reality and the convenience which it brings, naturally brings forth the question about maintaining the possibility of judicial review of criminal proceedings in writing, in particular on the court of appeal, in cases not covered by the Criminal Procedure Law of Republic of Latvia. This raises the question whether, within the framework of fair proceedings, an appellate court may adjudicate a case in written procedure, if the court proceedings of the first instance had resulted in an acquittal.
Brīvības robežu pārskatīšana, dzīvojot apdraudējumu apstākļos. I. Latvijas Universitātes Juridiskās fakultātes 9. starptautiskās zinātniskās konferences rakstu krājums = Revisiting the Limits of Freedom While Living Under Threat. I. The first collection of research papers in conjunction with the 9th International Scientific Conference of the Faculty of Law of the University of Latvia. Rīga: LU Akadēmiskais apgāds, 2024. 312 lpp.